The Power Pivot: U.S. Energy Policy at a Crossroads
Energy Considered’s 5,000 tracked Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) have been closely monitoring the divergence in energy diplomacy between the U.S. and China. In Q1 alone, those leaders mentioned U.S. energy policies 163 times, reflecting a surge of attention on how Washington was balancing its clean energy momentum with continued fossil expansion. The Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law accelerated offshore wind, solar, and nuclear projects, while LNG terminals and pipelines still advanced. Energy Considered’s tracked KOLs, including Robert Kad (Midstream & Natural Gas / Infrastructure, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Global Investment Office, U.S.), emphasised that LNG growth remains central to U.S. trade leverage, though its credibility depends on pairing fossil expansion with consistent clean energy delivery.
As the second quarter unfolded, the narrative had taken a different direction. Mentions of U.S. policies tracked by Energy Considered experts fell to 122, as diplomacy turned outward. Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s visits to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar unlocked new LNG and Small Modular Reactor (SMR) agreements, with firms like ExxonMobil and NextEra leading the charge. Alastair Syme (Managing Director, Citi, UK) summed up the underlying dilemma: “The divide is not really one around political ideology, it is one around affordability.” His words reflect how Energy Considered’s KOLs are linking the success of U.S. diplomacy to the economics shaping global markets.